Author: ERI

Nonprofits Continue Shifting Health Care Costs to Employees

Posted on | by ERI

As nonprofits aim to attract and retain top talent under a ceiling of salary budget constraints, providing a competitive benefits package becomes increasingly important. The fourteenth annual Benefits in Nonprofit Organizations Survey, released on July 1, 2014, reports that nonprofits are paying approximately 70-75% of the total premium cost of medical coverage, on par with 2013 levels but substantially lower than employer contributions in 2012 (87%). Similar to employers in the private industry, nonprofit organizations appear to be continuing cost saving strategies by shifting more expenses on to the employees.

In addition to a strong focus on medical, prescription, and dental costs, the survey also reports data on life and disability insurance, retirement plan practices, paid leave, and other benefits.  Some highlights include the following:

  • Preferred Provider Organization plans remain the most prevalent type of medical benefits delivery in 2014.
  • At least one dental plan is offered to employees in 95% of responding organizations.
  • Sixty-eight percent of respondents offer vision benefits. Of those organizations, 34% offer vision as part of the medical plan.
  • Ninety-seven percent of responding organizations offer some form of retirement plan to employees.

Questionnaires for the Benefits in Nonprofit Organization Survey were designed and distributed in October 2013. Submissions were collected until March 2014, with an effective date of benefits as of January 1, 2014. Data for 122 medical plans covering over 13,500 employees were reported in the 2014 sample. Eighty-four dental plans were also reported. Data cuts are provided by type of nonprofit organization, organization size (by number of employees), organizational scope, and geographic region. Results may be purchased for $489 via http://salary-surveys.erieri.com.

A companion benefit report published in April 2014, the Health Care Benefits Benchmarking Survey, which includes nonprofit organizations, government entities, and for-profit organizations (private and publicly traded), is also available online through ERI Salary Surveys.

Tracking Nonprofit Executive Salaries: Environmental and Animal Organizations

Posted on | by ERI

So how much does the executive director of “Poodles in Peril” or “Save Cripple Creek from the Developers” earn each year? How much should he or she make?  While these are imaginary organizations, groups with similar names asking for donations seem to be everywhere – in the daily mail, highway billboards, television, and print media.  The appeals are numerous, and the accompanying pictures and prose are dramatic and engaging, but how do these types of organizations (categorized as “environment/animal” in the National Taxonomy of Exempt Entities, the classification system used in the nonprofit sector) fit into the nonprofit sector?  How much do their executives make compared to similar-sized nonprofits providing other types of services?

While there are close to 1.6 million nonprofit organizations registered with the Internal Revenue Service in the United States, only about 40% of them have revenues reaching the level of $50,000 that requires the filing of an annual Form 990 (with the exception of private foundations, which must file a Form 990-PF regardless of revenue or asset size).  Public charities (tax-exempt organizations to which donors can make tax-deductible donations) are a subset of the more than 30 types of tax-exempt organizations and comprise about 80% of the total.

The number of reporting public charities – meeting the revenue requirement for filing a Form 990 – is about 300,000 each year.  About 35% are involved in human services, while the second largest category is education organizations (almost 18%), followed by health organizations (12%).

Trailing in both numbers and size are environmental/animal public charities.  There are about 15,000 of them nationwide, but annual revenues total about $15 billion, less than 1% of the total revenues in the nonprofit sector.  While the number of groups has increased over 50% over the past ten years, they still represent less than 5% of the total of public charities and hold less than 1% of the assets in the sector.  See more on the composition of the sector in the annual report prepared by the National Center for Charitable Statistics at the Urban Institute.

When compared to other types of nonprofits, environmental/animal groups tend to pay their executive directors (EDs) on the low side, according to the analysis of Form 990 compensation data from ERI’s Nonprofit Comparables Assessor.  The table below shows the relevant comparisons.

Along with size and type of services provided, another factor that impacts salary levels for EDs is geographic location.  First, annual salaries for EDs of similar-sized environmental/animal organizations are compared for different locations where many might be expected to be located.   Overall, the ED salaries of organizations in these large states and in Washington, DC (perhaps attempting to influence national policy and legislation) are higher than the average salaries throughout the US.

The table below shows salaries in some other geographic locations – and it is significant but variable.

The bottom line – the IRS regulations require that public charities look at compensation data from similar organizations (typically defined as similar in type of service provided, size, geographic location) in the process of setting executive salary levels.  These factors all have significant impacts on what nonprofit executives are paid, as demonstrated above for environmental/animal organizations.

The Impact of Salary Caps on NYS Nonprofits

Posted on | by ERI

In New York State, when the state legislature failed to act to place caps on executive salaries in nonprofits providing state-funded human services, the state implemented regulations to achieve the same goal (see http://executiveorder38.ny.gov/ for more information).  However, State Supreme Court Judge Thomas Feinman of Nassau County rejected those caps in a recent decision on a lawsuit by the Agencies for Children’s Therapy, a non-profit that represents more than 30 agencies that provide early intervention, prekindergarten, special education and other services to children throughout the state.  More information is available here.

The judge thought that the Department of Health had overstepped its boundaries and noted that the state legislature had already rejected similar proposals.

No information is available on whether or not the state will appeal this ruling, but an analysis of the Form 990 data on salaries for New York State (NYS) nonprofits that provide human services and typically receive state funds show why the salary caps were of concern to the nonprofits.  As is typical, the mean salaries for executive directors increased with the size (based on annual revenues) of the organization.  ERI’s analysis using the Nonprofit Comparables Assessor shows that an organization with revenues of $20 million or more on the average pays its executive director more than the cap of $199,000.

Some of the NYS human services organizations included in the above calculation may not be covered under the current salary cap regulations as they may not receive state funds to provide services, or may be exempt from the cap for some other reason.  But the table above does provide information on the market rate for executive directors of these types of organizations.  For those covered by the cap, there would be a significant impact.

The IRS regulations call for salary data for similar nonprofits to be used in salary determination, and typical criteria to determine comparability include size, location, and type of services provided.  The IRS does not use arbitrary salary caps but requires that the executive boards setting the salaries look at appropriate comparable data.

The salary data do indicate why NYS human services organizations are concerned about the salary cap and why a lawsuit was launched.  The table below details the number of NYS organizations in each of three different size categories (roughly small, medium and large), with an estimate of the number and percent of organizations impacted by the salary cap.

It is clear that an arbitrary salary cap does not take into account one of the main criteria for setting salaries — size of the organization.  It appears that larger organizations in NYS will especially have a difficult time attracting and retaining top executives if the salary cap is fully implemented.

Job Analysis and FLSA Executive Exemption Test

Posted on | by ERI

In March 2014, significant changes were proposed to the Fair Labor Standards Act and targeted for likely enactment in mid to late 2015; they are still pending a public notice and comment period.  One of the changes that employers should follow is the possible elimination of the concurrent duties exemption of primary duties for the executive exemption test.

Some employers rely on this provision for first time supervisors promoted from non-exempt positions who now have new “performance manager” and “operations manager” responsibilities.  These new responsibilities qualify them for executive exemption, yet such employees concurrently spend substantial amounts of time performing the non-exempt duties of their previous roles.  For example, a hotel’s housekeeping supervisor will manage housekeeping and the staff, yet is expected to perform general housekeeping duties when there is down time.  The gray area is the percent of time spent on “executive duties.”  Other than California (which requires 50% of primary duties to be executive duties), the other states do not quantify the threshold.

To comply with the FLSA executive exemption, the employer should conduct a job analysis using a systematic approach to collecting job content.  Then the job analysis results need to be evaluated against three specific criteria for the executive exemption test:

  1. Primary duty is management of the enterprise or of a customarily recognized department or subdivision;
  2. Customarily and regularly directs the work of two or more other employees; and
  3. Authority to hire or fire, or having suggestions and recommendations given particular weight as to hiring, firing, advancement promotion or any other change of status to other employees.

Below are two screenshots from ERI Economic Research Institute’s Occupational Assessor, a job analysis application for employers to use in assessment FLSA exemptions.

Screenshot #1:  Here, the user summarizes job analysis results into the primary duty and top four responsibilities, which in total comprise 100% of the job content.  The analyst is also required to specifically assign percentages for each duty.

Screenshot #2:  The user documents his or her evaluation of the criteria for the executive exemption by answering and providing justification of the responses, as displayed in the image below.

ERI anticipates that most retail or consumer service industries will be affected by this possible change, requiring them to either redesign jobs and operations workflow or simply reclassify these jobs as non-exempt and pay overtime.   To learn more about how you can effectively manage FLSA related job analysis, call ERI at 1-800-627-3697.

Compensation for Art Museum Directors: Do Men Really Get Paid More?

Posted on | by ERI

The Association of Art Museum Directors recently reported that only 43% percent of art museums in the United States and Canada were headed by women, and salaries of those female directors averaged 79% of the salaries of their male peers.

The research showed that the gap varied with the size of the museum, as in these examples:

  • In museums with annual budgets less than $15 million, women directors actually make $1.02 on the dollar paid to male counterparts. There are many more women in these director positions.
  • In museums with budgets over $15 million, less than a quarter of the top positions are held by women, and they make 71 cents on the male dollar.
  • As the museums get larger, the number of women directors decreased.  The report found, at 33 art museums with annual budgets over $20 million, only five were run by women.

ERI’s Nonprofit Comparables Assessor provides some insight on the actual level of salaries for museum directors across the United States, as reported on the Forms 990 filed annually with the IRS by each museum.

The table below lists the average salaries by size of the museum, as measured by annual revenues, but with no division by gender.

What is clear from the ERI analysis of Form 990 compensation data above is that directors of larger museums get paid much more than those of small museums.

Reviewing the names of the directors can give an initial view of the male-female differences, but more research is required for some names that are not easily assigned a gender.  With that caveat, consider these findings:

  • Of the 20 highest paid directors of smaller museums (organizational revenues between $1 million and $5 million), 8 were women; there were 457 museums of that size category, and almost 40% of the total were headed by women.
  • Of the 20 highest paid directors of larger museums (revenues between $25 million and $50 million), 4 were women; there were 36 museums in that size category and, overall, less than a third were headed by women.

While the ERI analysis of director salaries by gender tends to confirm the findings of the Association of Art Museum Directors report, the method that nonprofit organizations need to use to set compensation that complies with IRS regulations remains the same – salary data from comparable organizations must be collected and analyzed. ERI’s Nonprofit Comparables Assessor provides a way to analyze the data by size, location, and by gender of the director to help ensure that there is no discrimination in setting compensation.

Discussion of CEO Ratios Moves to Government and Nonprofits

Posted on | by ERI

As the US slowly emerges from the recent recession, indications of increasing “income inequality” have become the focus of much discussion, and some action.  Research by the Economic Policy Institute (see www.epi.org/publication/unequal-states/ for more details) reveals the following:

  • Between 1979 and 2007, the top 1% of US taxpayers took home over half of the total increase in US income.
  • Over this same period, the average income of the bottom 99% of US taxpayers grew almost 19%, while the average income of the top 1% grew over 10 times as much—by over 200%.
  • Incomes at all levels declined in the recent recession, but, when income began to grow again in 2009, it was not even – in fact, the top 1% captured 95% of total income growth from 2009 to 2012, according to University of California at Berkeley economist Emmanuel Saez.
  • By 2012, the most recent year for which data are available, the top 1% earned 22.5% of all income in the US.

The recent Securities and Exchange Commission requirement that publicly held companies calculate and disclose the ratio of CEO pay to the pay of the company’s median worker will highlight the salary difference between the executives and the average worker.  In 2012, according to the Economic Policy Institute, that ratio was typically 273:1.  For reference, management guru Peter Drucker once said that the ratio of CEO pay to worker pay should be no more than 20 to 1.

Now some public and nonprofit organizations are joining this discussion, since they exist “to serve the public good,” with salaries subject to public scrutiny.  At St. Mary’s College, a small liberal arts college affiliated with the University of Maryland (a public state university), a proposal to cap the ratio between the president’s salary and the average worker at the college at 10:1 was recently discussed (and then defeated 9:8 in a vote by the Faculty Senate).  The current ratio is 13:1, already very different from the ratio in most corporations and at other universities.

With the SEC ratio reporting coming soon for public for-profit corporations and with federal and state legislative efforts to raise the minimum wage, look for more proposals to address increasing income equality, both from shareholders of companies and from “stakeholders” – such as clients, funders, and the public —  in nonprofit organizations, and even with government entities.  In the meantime, setting compensation using data from comparable organizations is the method most often used – and the only method approved by IRS for nonprofits.  ERI’s Nonprofit Comparables Assessor provides easy access to that needed data for nonprofits, while the Executive Compensation Assessor focuses on for-profit data.

Tracking Nonprofit Executive Salaries – Nursing Homes

Posted on | by ERI

While economists and various pundits endlessly review each new government jobs report for impact on the recovery and growth of the US economy, one trend may have slipped by most observers – the difference in job growth among the for profit and nonprofit sectors.

Close to 11 million workers in the United States are now employed in the nonprofit sector, representing over 10% of the total work force.  While post-recession recovery in the number of jobs has been sluggish overall in the for-profit sector, nonprofit employment was been much less affected and has continued to grow.  The primary reason for the difference is that most nonprofit work is in three fields – health (57%, including 37% in hospitals), education (15%), and social assistance (13%).  As the overall growth in US jobs in recent years has been in service industries, a higher proportion of the jobs created have been nonprofit sector jobs, most of which provide services.  In general, nonprofit employment is concentrated in the growth areas of the economy, while for-profit employment has been concentrated in the fields that have been shedding jobs.

More details on nonprofit employment trends are available in a recent report by Johns Hopkins University’s Center for Civil Society. The study reports that growth in health employment has averaged 2% per year from 2000 to 2010, but it differs by field:

While the number of jobs in certain fields has grown, how has that translated into salaries?  Using ERI’s Nonprofit Comparables Assessor, the table below shows the considerable geographic variation in compensation for executive directors of nonprofit nursing homes of different sizes, based on data reported on the annual Form 990.  Remember, this is a census, rather than a survey, because all nonprofit nursing homes are required to file the form with the IRS.

Setting nonprofit compensation requires the collection and use of comparable data, according to IRS rules.  Obviously, depending on the size and the location of a nonprofit nursing home, the appropriate salary for the director needs some documentation, and is easily accessed from ERI’s Nonprofit Comparables Assessor.

 

 

Deadline Extended for ERI’s Health Care Benefits Survey

Posted on | by ERI

There’s Still Time to Participate
Don’t miss out on contributing to ERI Salary Surveys seventh annual Health Care Benefits Benchmarking Survey. Participants save 50% off the results! We’ve extended the deadline to accommodate even more employers in the public, private, and nonprofit sectors, as well as government entities in the United States.

Save 50% Off
A 50% discount is available to organizations that participate before February 7, 2014. Participate now and pay later. Your submission locks in the participation discount for when you’re ready to purchase. The survey covers the following details:

  • Eligibility Requirements
  • General Features of Medical Coverage
  • Types of Medical Plans Offered
  • Opt-Out Provisions
  • Co-Payments and Coinsurance Amounts
  • Employer and Employee Medical Plan Costs
  • Prescription Drug Plan Co-Payments
  • Cost-Saving Measures
  • Types of Dental Plans Offered
  • Employer and Employee Dental Plan Costs
  • Vision Benefits

Benefits in Nonprofit Organizations Survey
Additionally, ERI Salary Surveys sponsors a companion benefit report for nonprofit organizations, covering health care insurance, general benefit practices, disability insurance, retirement plan practices, paid leave, and executive perquisites. Participate before March 31, 2014, to receive a 50% discount off the final report. Participate in the Benefits in Nonprofit Organizations Survey

Are you an ERI Assessor Series® subscriber? If so, participate in any of our applicable surveys to receive a PDF version of the results for free.

Data collection began on October 1, 2013, and ends on February 7, 2014, for the Health Care Benefits Benchmarking Survey and ends on March 31, 2014, for the Benefits in Nonprofit Organizations Survey. Survey results will be published in April 2014 (Health Care Benefits) and July 2014 (Benefits in Nonprofits.) All survey participants will receive a complimentary copy of the Executive Summary. Participation discounts do not apply to Assessor subscriptions. For more information or to request participation materials, please visit www.salary-surveys.erieri.com or call 1-877-210-6563.

States Target Nonprofit Executive Pay

Posted on | by ERI

Should nonprofit executives “volunteer” a part of their compensation (by receiving a discounted salary) because they work for a charitable organization?  Alternatively, is a “high” salary important to attract the kind of talent needed to achieve the purpose of the nonprofit?  The IRS says that pay must be reasonable and that salary data on comparable jobs in comparable organizations must be used to document that what is paid is appropriate.  However, some states are moving to supplement that IRS scrutiny at the federal level with some limits on salaries for nonprofits at the state level.  (More discussion at http://www.cbiz.com/page.asp?pid=10098)

When nonprofits are funded by state grants and contracts, proponents of executive salary caps say that taxpayers should not pay high salaries.  As in the private sector, there is concern that executive pay is too high as a multiple of the average worker’s pay, although it seems unlikely that an executive salary cap will cause other salaries to increase.  Other advocates of salary caps contend that they will reduce the state’s costs and that additional money needed for the executives can be funded from other sources, like federal grants or private donations.  However, critics say that pay limits would make it much more difficult for nonprofits to hold onto top executives and recruit qualified new ones.  If a high salary results in higher revenue for the organization, they contend it is money well spent.

While the debate about state regulations continues, some of the organizations that pay the highest salaries, such as hospitals, may not be affected, as their revenues may come from the federal government or from private philanthropy rather than via state funds.

Currently, New York and New Jersey actually have some regulations in place, setting salary caps on nonprofits that receive state revenues.  In Massachusetts, legislation has been proposed, and the Attorney General has issued several reports on high pay which illustrate the state’s concern.  In Florida, legislation was also discussed but not enacted.

The different existing regulations and legislative proposals contain a lot of details which must be considered to fully assess the impact of a cap on nonprofit salaries, but below is a table providing an overview, developed using ERI’s Nonprofit Comparables Assessor.  The average annual pay for an Executive Director of two types of organizations (Arts and Human Services) with $25 million in annual revenues is shown in the four states, along with the salary cap under discussion or in force.

This table illustrates several points:

  • Arts organizations pay their EDs much more than human services nonprofits.
  • Florida salaries are often lower than in the other states.
  • Salary caps, if implemented as proposed in Florida, could have a major impact; but the impact for Massachusetts would be much less because of the higher cap under discussion.
  • The caps in effect in NY and NJ might have a significant effect, but the various exemptions available have mitigated that impact for many organizations.

As the Massachusetts AG’s report suggests, “nonprofit compensation committees … should consider their charitable mission, how the executive pay compares to other workers’ salaries, and take into account the amount of public support the nonprofit receives from its tax-exempt status.” Legislators in many states as well as the IRS regulators are watching closely as these compensation decisions are made.

A Modest Suggestion on Pay for Nonprofit Executives

Posted on | by ERI

A recent blog by George Weiner suggests the following approach for a nonprofit to reduce those pesky overhead costs that are so often the focus of criticism:

One-Year Overhead Plan

In response to the changing demand of funders we are looking to reduce all overhead including but not limited to office space, technology and software, salaried employees, donation processing fees, benefits, impact analysis and transportation costs. Ideal candidate should be able and willing to bicycle (or drive at own expense) to retrieve our donor’s sacks of cash to deliver directly to our stakeholders.

Salary: $0 (incommensurate with experience)

Benefits: Working for an incredible cause, warm fuzzy feelings

Obviously, this modest suggestion reflects the ongoing frustration of nonprofits in responding to critiques of their compensation levels to all their stakeholders – donors, funders, clients, federal and state regulators, as well as the public, informed by the media.  Most of the attention on compensation is concentrated on where most of the money is in the nonprofit sector – the large “meds” (hospitals and health organizations) and “eds” (colleges and universities).  But the negative fallout from high compensation for some organizations is felt by the whole sector.

The table below uses the ERI’s Nonprofit Comparables Assessor to calculate average salaries for Executive Directors of nonprofit organizations of smaller sizes, which comprise the vast majority of the nonprofit sector.  The Form 990 data show that the head of a typical $1-million organization would be expected to earn around $87,500.  Executive Directors of Human Services organizations with $1 million in annual revenues have a typical salary of around $78,000, while those in Arts and Environmental organizations fare slightly better.  These smaller organizations and these salaries are far more typical of the nonprofit sector than the large “meds” and “eds.”

Clearly, these salaries are not very high.  When an organization of these typical sizes and types pays much more than the average salaries shown, a responsible board of directors needs to be able to justify its compensation practices.  But it is clear that most nonprofit executive salaries are not what could be considered high.  When the much higher compensation levels in a few organizations is criticized, the smaller organizations, even though paying much less, also need to be able to show the reasonableness of their executive salaries.

ERI’s Nonprofit Comparables Assessor can easily show what salaries would be expected in various types and sizes of organizations; a specific geographic location can also be added as a criterion to complete the analysis needed to determine comparable compensation.  To learn more about average salaries in the nonprofit sector and where the highest salaries are likely to be found, check out ERI’s white paper “Charity Executive Pay.”